ReviewThoracic cancer2026
Exhaled Breath Analysis for Lung Cancer Detection: From VOCs Signatures to EBC-Based Liquid Biopsy and Clinical Translation.
Review in Thoracic cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Although low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is the current standard for early screening, its high false-positive rates and cumulative radiation exposure create a pressing clinical need for complementary, non-invasive diagnostic tools. Exhaled breath analysis represents an accessible strategy for early detection and risk stratification. Early breathomics primarily focused on gas-phase volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, as volatile metabolites, VOCs are chemically unstable and highly susceptible to background ambient air and physiological confounders. Distinct from gas-phase analysis, exhaled breath condensate (EBC) offers enhanced biomarker stability and functions as a lung-proximal liquid biopsy. By capturing non-volatile, high-molecular-weight analytes, including tumor-derived nucleic acids and proteins, EBC more closely reflects the underlying molecular mechanisms of the respiratory microenvironment. Nevertheless, the clinical translation of EBC remains constrained by severe sample dilution, unstandardized collection device architectures, and pre-analytical inconsistencies. This review summarizes the progression from VOCs profiling to EBC-based platforms, detailing recent advances in sample harvesting, ultrasensitive detection technologies, and multi-omics integration. Advancing EBC toward routine clinical use requires consensus-driven standard operating procedures and the application of machine learning algorithms to high-dimensional datasets. Future efforts should prioritize large-scale, multicenter prospective trials to validate specific EBC signatures, thereby establishing this technology as a reliable liquid biopsy for precision pulmonary oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.