ArticleBone & joint open2026
Development of a therapist-supervised flexibility and resistance exercise intervention for adults aged 50 years and over with a distal radius fracture in the Wrist Injury Strengthening Exercise (WISE) trial.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: The definitive Wrist Injury Strengthening Exercise (WISE) trial is a multicentre superiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating usual care advice plus a therapist-supervised flexibility and resistance exercise intervention versus usual care advice alone for adults aged ≥ 50 years with a distal radius fracture (DRF). This paper describes the development and delivery of the therapist-supervised exercise intervention evaluated in the definitive WISE RCT. Methods: The intervention was developed iteratively in accordance with Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance for complex interventions. UK DRF clinical guidelines, published rehabilitation RCTs, UK NHS patient information leaflets, common post-injury impairments, and exercise and behavioural theory were reviewed to inform candidate intervention components. Feedback from UK therapists and patient and public involvement partners then informed the design of the initial intervention. Two methods of intervention delivery were then evaluated in a multicentre feasibility RCT and embedded qualitative study involving 117 participants aged ≥ 50 years with a distal radius fracture. Results: Review of guidelines and previous research highlighted uncertainty regarding the optimal rehabilitation after DRF and limited reporting of progressive exercise interventions. NHS patient information leaflets largely focused on flexibility exercises and self-management advice. Therapist and patient feedback informed the intervention content, progression, and participant materials. Findings from the feasibility RCT and embedded qualitative study supported a therapist-supervised delivery model with three sessions, rather than a single-session independent exercise approach. The final intervention comprised usual care advice plus up to three one-to-one sessions with a physiotherapist or occupational therapist over 12 weeks. Participants also received a workbook containing self-management advice, progressive flexibility and resistance exercises with resistance bands and therapeutic putty, and behaviour change strategies to support exercise adherence. Conclusion: Using an iterative MRC-informed process, a therapist-supervised rehabilitation intervention was developed and refined prior to definitive evaluation. Transparent reporting of intervention development and content should support interpretation, replication, and implementation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.