ArticleSAHARA J : journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance2026
Safer conception services for HIV-affected couples must address overlooked relationship dynamics: a commentary and call to action.
Article in SAHARA J : journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data from East and Southern Africa shows the desire for children is strong among people living with HIV (PLHIV). Concurrently, many new HIV infections in East and Southern Africa occur in long-term sero-different relationships and may be due to the couples' attempts to become pregnant. Safer conception (SC) is a promising sexual and reproductive health service for PLHIV in Africa, yet it remains underutilised for high-priority at-risk populations, presenting a missed opportunity to prevent HIV transmission. Relationship-focused couples' interventions have improved sexual and reproductive health and HIV outcomes in East, West, and Southern Africa, but this approach has not been employed in the SC realm. We suggest a shift in SC interventions by moving from an individual-level approach (e.g. approaches focused on women or men separately), to a couples-based approach informed by a couples-based theoretical model. While promising, most existing SC interventions are limited by their emphasis on individuals instead of couples, thereby failing to recognise that each partner influences the behaviours of the other either directly or indirectly. Also, existing interventions offering SC services and counselling to couples have not tried to address relationship dynamics to improve biobehavioral outcomes. We are guided by Lewis et al.'s Interdependence Model of Health Behavior Change, which posits that both partners can influence each other's health behaviours and HIV prevention decisions. SC presents an avenue for reaching sero-different couples desiring children, making it an ideal window of opportunity to engage couples in HIV care and prevention and sexual and reproductive health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.