ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2026
Ultrasound-triggered metabolic responses of Lactobacillus acidophilus at different growth phases enhance the functional quality of Citrus aurantium L. juice.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that ultrasound-assisted lactic acid bacteria (LAB) fermentation can improve the functional quality of fruit juices. However, the growth phase-dependent metabolic responses of LAB to low-frequency ultrasonication remain poorly understood. In this study, low-frequency ultrasonication (83.6 and 119.17 W/L) was applied during the lag, logarithmic, and stationary phases of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA137 fermentation in Citrus aurantium L. juice. Microbial growth, physicochemical properties, β-glucosidase activity, total phenolic and flavonoid contents, and antioxidant capacity were evaluated in this study. Ultrasonication applied during the logarithmic and stationary phases exerted greater effects on microbial metabolism and functional quality than treatment during the lag phase. Among all treatments, ultrasonication at 119.17 W/L during the logarithmic phase (LU4) and 83.6 W/L during the stationary phase (LU5) showed superior enhancement of β-glucosidase activity, phenolic/flavonoid accumulation, and antioxidant capacity. Integrated untargeted metabolomics revealed distinct metabolic responses between LU4 and LU5. LU4 preferentially promoted phenylpropanoid and flavonoid metabolism, resulting in the accumulation of antioxidant-related metabolites, including gallic acid, taxifolin, and 7-galloylcatechin. In contrast, LU5 mainly enhanced amino acid and organic acid metabolism, leading to increased levels of lactic acid, γ-aminobutyric acid, alanine, and serine. Correlation analysis further linked these metabolites to improved antioxidant properties. These findings demonstrate that low-frequency ultrasonication redirects microbial metabolism toward distinct functional routes depending on the growth phase of L. acidophilus, providing new mechanistic insights into the precise regulation of ultrasound-assisted LAB fermentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42896425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.