ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Physiological Responses, Exercise Intensity, and Enjoyment During Ring Fit Adventure in Adults With Chronic Diseases: Single-Arm, Pre-Post Experimental Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Physical inactivity and insufficient muscle-strengthening exercise remain important public health concerns among adults with chronic diseases. Active video games may offer an accessible way to support exercise participation, but many may not provide sufficient exercise intensity to produce meaningful physiological responses. Ring Fit Adventure (RFA) is an active video game that combines aerobic and resistance-based exercise. However, little is known about its physiological demands among adults with chronic diseases. Objective: This pilot study aimed to examine the acute physiological responses, exercise intensity, perceived exertion, and enjoyment during RFA gameplay in adults with stable chronic diseases. Methods: A single-arm, pre-post experimental study was conducted among 20 adults aged 40 to 65 years with at least one chronic disease. Participants were recruited through convenience and snowball sampling from a hospital-based setting and public recruitment channels. After baseline assessment and familiarization, participants completed 2 stages of RFA gameplay. Heart rate (HR) was continuously monitored, while blood pressure (BP), capillary blood glucose (BG), and the rate of perceived exertion were measured at baseline and immediately after each stage. Enjoyment was assessed using the Exergame Enjoyment Questionnaire (EEQ). Results: All 20 participants completed the study, with no adverse events or missing data. The mean age was 54.3 (95% CI 51.25-57.25) years, and 10 participants were male. Hypertension was the most common condition (n=14, 70%), followed by hyperlipidemia (n=11, 55%), obesity (n=8, 40%), and diabetes (n=5, 25%). The mean continuous HR during gameplay was 111.6 (95% CI 102.6-120.6) bpm, corresponding to 67.2% of the age-predicted maximum HR, while peak HR reached 138.6 (95% CI 128.9-148.3) bpm, corresponding to 83.5% of the age-predicted maximum HR. HR increased significantly after World 1 by 16.7 (95% CI 11.42-21.88; Conclusions: RFA elicited moderate average exercise intensity with periods of vigorous intensity, reductions in capillary BG, stable postexercise BP, and high enjoyment among adults with stable chronic diseases. These findings suggest that RFA may be a feasible and engaging home-based exercise option for this population. However, the small, heterogeneous sample, absence of a control condition, and single-session design limit generalizability. Larger controlled longitudinal studies are needed to determine its effects on exercise adherence, physical activity levels, and cardiometabolic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.