ReviewCirculation2026
Radiation Vasculopathy of the Coronary Arteries: State-of-the Art Review.
Review in Circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiation-associated coronary artery disease (RACAD) is a distinct form of coronary artery disease with several specific biological and clinical aspects as well as key knowledge gaps. RACAD is prevalent in patients with cardiac exposure to radiotherapy. As radiotherapy is integral to the effective treatment of many thoracic malignancies, improved long-term survivorship is coupled with increased risk for RACAD. Ionizing radiation induces free radical generation and activation of proinflammatory cascades, leading to endothelial dysfunction and accelerated atherosclerosis. Risks for RACAD are determined both by radiotherapy, including the radiation dose and the proximity of coronary arteries to the radiotherapy field, and by patient-specific factors, such as younger age, higher baseline cardiovascular risk, and concurrent cardiotoxic systemic therapies. Importantly, radiotherapy delivery is highly individualized on the basis of tumor location and treatment strategy, resulting in heterogeneous coronary exposure to radiation and patient-to-patient variability. Clinical presentation may occur early, within 1 to 2 years, especially in patients with higher cardiac radiation doses (eg, lung or esophageal cancer), or after a latency period of 5 to 20 years with lower cardiac dose radiation exposure (eg, left-sided breast cancer). Patients generally present with symptoms similar to conventional coronary artery disease. However, RACAD symptoms may be underrecognized in cancer survivors due to overlapping treatment-related fatigue, pulmonary disease, or competing oncologic symptoms. Diagnosis and management generally follow standard coronary artery disease guidelines while incorporating cancer-specific considerations, such as planned oncologic surgeries, bleeding risk, postradiotherapy complications such as atretic internal mammary arteries, and cardiotoxic effects of systemic cancer therapies. Primary prevention of RACAD is critical, emphasizing advances in precision radiotherapy, including delivery techniques with improved coronary dosimetry, and cardiac shielding. Key knowledge gaps include understanding long-term outcomes with contemporary 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy techniques, validated cancer-specific risk prediction models on the basis of coronary dosimetry, optimal surveillance protocols, targeted molecular pharmacotherapies, and risk analysis of percutaneous versus surgical management of RACAD. Prospective studies are needed to develop cancer- and dosimetry-specific risk calculators, validating cardioprotective interventions, and improving multidisciplinary cardio-oncology collaboration to optimize early detection of RACAD and timely intervention in the growing population of cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.