ArticleThe European journal of general practice2026
Advance care planning in people with intellectual disabilities, more than 'to resuscitate or not to resuscitate': A qualitative interview study with general practitioners and family caregivers.
Article in The European journal of general practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvance care planning for people (ACP) with intellectual disabilities requires timely and carefully communication between family caregivers and general practitioners.
objectivesDespite its recognised importance, little is known about how these stakeholders experience advance care planning and decision-making processes, particularly regarding goals of care and do not resuscitate (DNR) orders, highlighting a critical gap in ensuring person-centred palliative care for this population.
methodsA qualitative design was used to investigate how Belgian general practitioners and family caregivers of adults (≥18 years) with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities (IQ ≤ 50) approach and experience decision-making about treatment goals and DNR directives. The data were analysed thematically.
findingsInterviews with six family caregivers and five general practitioners identified six themes: limited preparedness for ACP, the need for open discussion, communication challenges, involvement of key stakeholders, timing, and positive outcomes. Participants reported limited ACP knowledge and a need for earlier, broader conversations that extend beyond DNR decisions. Emotional barriers, uncertainty, and concerns about discussing end-of-life care too early often delayed ACP. Family caregivers generally expected GPs to initiate discussions, while both groups emphasised multidisciplinary involvement and timely, proactive conversations. Despite challenges, ACP discussions were often experienced as reassuring and helpful.
conclusionsACP for adults with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities is shaped by knowledge gaps, communication barriers, and uncertainty about timing. Early, proactive, and multidisciplinary approaches that address personal values alongside treatment preferences may support person-centred decision-making and improve experiences of end-of-life planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.