Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42895745›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Initial Treatment for Acute Low Back Pain and Risk of Opioid Use Disorder and Overdose.

Lisa V Doan, Anton M Hung, Mark Olfson, Nicholas T Williams, Kara E Rudolph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa V DoanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Anton M HungDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Mark OlfsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Nicholas T WilliamsDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Kara E RudolphDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Guideline-discordant care for acute low back pain (aLBP) is common and has been associated with adverse outcomes. Objectives: To estimate the incidence of new opioid use disorder (OUD) or overdose diagnosis among opioid-naive patients with Medicaid coverage initiating treatment for aLBP and to evaluate the association between initial treatment modalities and subsequent risk of OUD or overdose diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, with 13 months of follow-up (1-month exposure assessment followed by 12 months of outcome follow-up) from the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System Analytic Files from 25 states that expanded Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by 2014. Participants included opioid-naive, adults aged less than 65 years who received pain treatment within 1 month of diagnosis of aLBP. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2025, to July 31, 2026. Exposures: Initial pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for aLBP. Main Outcomes and Measures: OUD or overdose diagnosis, defined using diagnostic codes for opioid abuse, opioid dependence, opioid-involved overdose, or a prescription for medication for treating OUD. Results: In this cohort of  399 500 Medicaid patients who initiated treatment for newly diagnosed aLBP, the median age was 39 (IQR, 30-50) years, and 237 846 (59.5%) were female. The cumulative incidence of OUD or overdose diagnosis was 1.4% at 7 months and 2.3% at 13 months. Initiating vs not initiating higher-dose opioids (>50 mg of morphine equivalent) as part of the initial treatment was associated with the greatest risk, increasing risk of OUD or overdose by 146.6% (95% CI, 121.5%-171.7%). Initiating vs not initiating lower-dose opioids prescribed for more than 7 days or gabapentinoids each increased risk by 105.2% (95% CI, 89.0%-121.4%) and 101.6% (95% CI, 84.9%-118.2%), respectively. Nonpharmacologic, noninterventional therapies were associated with reductions in risk of OUD or overdose diagnosis. Initiating vs not initiating chiropractic care was associated with the largest relative risk reduction, decreasing risk by 32.8% (95% CI, 26.8%-38.9%), and initiating physical therapy was associated with 31.1% decreased risk (95% CI, 22.1%-40.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, nonpharmacologic, noninterventional treatment was associated with reductions in risk of OUD or overdose diagnosis while initiating treatment with opioids or gabapentinoids was each associated with higher risks. These results support guideline recommendations favoring nonpharmacologic treatments as first-line therapy for aLBP.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug OverdoseLow Back PainOpioid-Related DisordersAdultFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMedicaidMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID42895745
PMCPMC13681206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.