Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42895726›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2026

Mifepristone Patient Agreement Form and Medication Abortion Knowledge: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

M Antonia Biggs, Katherine Ehrenreich, Shelly Kaller, Lauren Ralph, Daniel Grossman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07604675 (Effect of the Patient Agreement Form), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07604675 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of the Patient Agreement Form (PAF) for Mifepristone on Medication Abortion Knowledge: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2025 to 2025Enrolled637ConditionsMedication Abortion, Health Knowledge Attitudes and Practice, Pregnant PeopleArmsPatient Agreement Form (PAF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Antonia BiggsAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health; University of California, San Francisco, Oakland.
Katherine EhrenreichAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health; University of California, San Francisco, Oakland.
Shelly KallerAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health; University of California, San Francisco, Oakland.
Lauren RalphAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health; University of California, San Francisco, Oakland.
Daniel GrossmanAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health; University of California, San Francisco, Oakland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: While the US Food and Drug Administration requires medication abortion patients to review and sign a patient agreement form (PAF) under its Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program, there is limited research examining whether the PAF improves patient knowledge. Objective: To determine whether patients are more knowledgeable about medication abortion after reviewing and signing the PAF. Design, Setting, and Participants: People receiving mifepristone and misoprostol medications (15 years or older and proficient in English or Spanish) were recruited from 5 facilities in California, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, and Minnesota (January to October 2025). After receiving standard clinic counseling and the mifepristone medication guide, patients were randomized into 2 study groups and then completed a survey either before (n = 301 control) or after (n = 292 exposed) receiving and signing the PAF. Data were analyzed December 2025 to August 2026. Intervention: The control group completed the survey before receiving the PAF and any PAF-related counseling. The exposed group received and signed the PAF and any PAF-related counseling and then completed a knowledge survey. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall medication abortion knowledge (correct response to 12 items regarding when to seek medical care, effectiveness, administration, potential serious risks, and side effects) and responses to each individual knowledge item. Results: A total of 593 participants (mean [SD] age, 26.9 [5.8] years; 44 Asian/Pacific Islander [7%], 132 Black [22%], 181 Hispanic [31%], and 159 White [27%] individuals) completed knowledge items (301 control [51%]; 292 exposed [49%]). Across participant characteristics, study groups only differed significantly in reported abortion history. In adjusted analyses, participants answered a mean (95% CI) of 10.37 (10.26-10.48) of 12 knowledge items consistently with the PAF with no study group differences (control: difference, 10.26; exposed: difference, 10.44; adjusted difference, 0.18; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.39). Nearly everyone knew to contact a "provider" if they "were to have an infection (590 [99%]) or heavy bleeding that soaked through 2 full-size sanitary pads per hour for 2 hours (566 [96%])." The items with answers that were least often concordant with the PAF included how often the treatment does not work (320 [54%]) and taking misoprostol 24 to 48 hours after mifepristone (458 [77%]). Conclusions and Relevance: The randomized clinical trial found that patient knowledge about medication abortion following standard counseling was high. Exposure to the required PAF did not result in a clinically meaningful increase in medication abortion knowledge. The findings raise questions about the PAF requirement from the US Food and Drug Administration, as it does not appear to be useful. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07604675.

Identifiers

PMID42895726
PMCPMC13681217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.