ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Single-Lead EEG-based virtual reality motion sickness detection using interpretable feature selection.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectroencephalography (EEG) is a key method for detecting virtual reality motion sickness (VRMS), but multi-lead recordings and high-dimensional features increase processing complexity, device cost, and user burden.
objectiveThis study proposes a SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based single-lead modeling and feature-screening framework to reduce the number of EEG leads and feature dimensions for lightweight VRMS detection.
methodSix classical deep-learning EEG decoding models were used to assess the contribution of each lead via SHAP values and identify the optimal single lead. Handcrafted features were then extracted and selected using a correlation-SHAP strategy, and XGBoost was adopted for final classification.
resultsFT11 showed competitive and relatively consistent performance across the evaluated models and was selected as the target lead after integrating SHAP-based lead importance, single-lead classification performance, frequency-band differences, and physiological relevance. Under the window-level tenfold cross-validation protocol used in this study, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 87.53% ± 0.73% using seven selected features, which was 9.55 percentage points lower than the full-lead full-feature model and 0.69 percentage points lower than the single-lead full-feature model. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings demonstrate an interpretable framework for identifying a compact single-lead and feature configuration for VRMS-related EEG discrimination. An additional post hoc LOSO test of the globally selected configuration showed limited performance on held-out participants. Because the lead, classifier, and feature configuration had been selected globally before LOSO testing, these results should not be interpreted as a fully independent estimate of cross-subject generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42895695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.