ArticleDermatology and therapy2026
Initiating Biologics in Atopic Dermatitis: Global Practices and Recommendations from the AMAZE Project.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBiologics have expanded treatment options for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), but practical guidance on how to initiate and manage these therapies in routine care remains limited. The advancing management of atopic dermatitis and eczema (AMAZE ) project examined global clinical practices and developed expert-informed recommendations to support biologic initiation and long-term management.
methodsAn online survey of 150 dermatologists from North America, Europe, and Japan assessed real-world approaches to biologic management. Findings were interpreted by an international global steering committee and further refined through expert discussion meetings. Best practice recommendations were developed on the basis of survey findings, expert consensus, and a narrative literature review.
resultsRespondents reported considerable variability in biologic initiation practices. Overall, 47% of dermatologists intended biologic therapy for long-term use, while Japanese clinicians more frequently anticipated shorter treatment durations (4-12 months), reflecting national guideline recommendations. Transition practices from conventional systemic therapies varied substantially between dermatologists: 49% reported overlapping, 33% transitioned directly without overlap, and 18% used a washout period. European clinicians were more likely to discontinue conventional systemic therapies prior to biologic initiation, whereas overlapping strategies were more common in North America and Japan. Early follow-up within 4 weeks was reported by 36% of dermatologists and was most common in Japan, largely owing to healthcare system requirements. Expert-informed recommendations emphasized: establishing patient-centered treatment goals focused on long-term disease control; individualized transition strategies when switching from conventional systemic therapies; structured follow-up with formal assessment of treatment response around 12-16 weeks after treatment initiation; and proactive management of flares through continued use of emollients and topical anti-inflammatory therapies.
conclusionsThe AMAZE project highlights substantial regional variation in biologic initiation practices for AD. These expert-informed recommendations provide practical guidance to support individualized, patient-centered approaches to initiating and managing biologic therapy in routine clinical practice. Graphical plain language summary available for this article at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32991755 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42895682What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.