Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42895639›Full record

ReviewDie Naturwissenschaften2026

Integrating airborne chemical ecology with informed intercropping for sustainable crop protection.

Sourav Manna, Ishita Paul, Mousumi Poddar Sarkar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sourav MannaSemiochemicals and Lipid Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, Presidency University, Kolkata, 700073, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6206-3440
Ishita PaulSemiochemicals and Lipid Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, Presidency University, Kolkata, 700073, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7175-6970
Mousumi Poddar SarkarSemiochemicals and Lipid Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, Presidency University, Kolkata, 700073, India. mousumipsarkar1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6272-9118

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/INF/22/SP45088/2022Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India DST/WISE-PDF/LS-172/2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in plant-insect interactions has been studied in detail in recent decades, especially in the context of environment-friendly integrated pest management (IPM) in agroecosystems. Field-based study and behavioural investigations have shown that specific VOCs (or combinations of VOCs) of companion crops are crucial in diverting phytophagous insects from main food or cash crops, along with attracting beneficial insects which decimate pest species. The functional mechanisms of these olfactory cues, however, are not always clear and distinctive, especially since these ecological interactions are highly variable. The complex 'odourscapes' occurring in mixed cropping systems are determined by species-specific interactions, local climate, prevalent agricultural/landscaping practices, and other environmental factors which need to be examined in localized contexts. This review aims to cover the dynamics and mechanisms of VOCs mediating plant-insect interactions in mixed crop settings, the variables and technical constraints to be considered for implementing these interactions for cost-effective IPM, and potential challenges presented by ecological fine-tuning of such interactions.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrop ProtectionCrops, AgriculturalVolatile Organic CompoundsAgroecologyAnimalsInsectaVolatile Organic Compoundsagroecosystemcompanion cropscrop volatilesintegrated pest managementodourscapeplant-insect interactions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.