ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2026
Functional connectivity and treatment response in obesity and eating disorders: Current evidence and empirical data.
Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alterations in large-scale brain networks have been reported in obesity (OB) and eating disorders (ED), but their relevance to treatment outcomes remains unclear. We reviewed evidence on neurobiological predictors of treatment outcome in ED and OB and present preliminary empirical analyses exploring baseline rsFC differences between individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN), obesity with comorbid ED (OB + ED), and obesity without ED (OB - ED) and healthy controls (HC), and examining whether these connectivity differences are associated with treatment outcome in the clinical groups. A total of 98 women (AN = 27, OB + ED = 25, OB - ED = 21, HC = 25) underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). rsFC networks were subsequently identified using probabilistic independent component analysis (ICA), and their associations with treatment outcomes were examined within each clinical group. Both OB groups showed reduced rsFC relative to HC within a thalamic-basal ganglia network, specifically in a cluster located in the left inferior occipital cortex encompassing extrastriate visual regions. Baseline connectivity in this occipital cluster showed a positive, although non-significant, association with treatment outcome in the OB - ED group, whereas no significant associations were observed in AN or OB + ED. Given the non-significant nature of this exploratory association, the observed relationship should be considered hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation in adequately powered samples. Further work is needed to clarify the role of sensory-integrative networks in treatment response across extreme weight conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42895595What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.