ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Emergency surgery for blunt abdominal trauma in polytrauma - the impact of time to laparotomy on outcomes.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBlunt abdominal trauma (BAT) is common in polytrauma patients. Emergency surgery is required for haemodynamically significant solid organ injury and intra-abdominal hollow organ injury. The effect of time to surgery on outcomes in patients requiring emergency laparotomy remains uncertain. MATERIALS &
methodsAdult polytrauma patients (ISS > 16) who underwent emergency laparotomy for blunt abdominal trauma between 1996 and 2020 from a trauma registry of a single level one trauma centre were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the time elapsed from admission to emergency laparotomy: "Super Early" (≤ 60 min) and "Early" (60-180 min). Length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU)-LOS, ventilation time, re-look operations and mortality were assessed. Adjusted logistic regression was used to determine the independent predictive parameters, including timing of surgery, for mortality.
resultsThe study included 190 polytrauma patients with concomitant blunt abdominal trauma (mean age 42 years (± 17), median ISS of 36 (IQR: 19)). There were 95 patients in each group. Patients in the "Super Early" group had a compromised haemodynamic status and a higher ISS. Liver injury and serous membrane injury were more common in the super early group. The mortality rate was significantly higher in the "Super Early" group (51.6%) compared to the "Early" group (26.3%) (p < 0.001). Death due to haemorrhagic shock was significantly more frequent in the "Super Early" group (36.8%) compared to the "Early" group (13.7%) (p < 0.001). A regression model was adjusted to determine the independent predictors of mortality. Time to emergency laparotomy was not an independent predictor of mortality. However, increased ISS (OR = 1.04, p = 0.049), age (OR = 1.03, p = 0.037) and decreased systolic blood pressure (OR = 0.98, p = 0.025) were found to be significant predictors of mortality.
conclusionThe timing of surgery showed no independent association with mortality as long as an emergency laparotomy was performed within 3 h of admission. The data suggests that patient-specific characteristics, injury severity and clinical status are more important for survival than the timing of an early emergency laparotomy. Future research should focus on determining the role of delayed laparotomy on outcomes in specific subgroups of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.