Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42895355›Full record

ReviewEvolutionary anthropology2026

Homo Memorabiliaxis: Souvenirs and the Evolution of Autobiographical Memory and Self.

Ran Barkai, Ella Assaf, Bar Efrati, Tal Simon, Liad Mudrik, Yoav Ram

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolutionary anthropology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ran BarkaiDepartment of Archaeology and Near Eastern Cultures, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8125-8788
Ella AssafDepartment of Archaeology and Near Eastern Cultures, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0489-7436
Bar EfratiSchool of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tal SimonIndependent Researcher, Pardes Hanna-Karkur, Israel.
Liad MudrikSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3564-6445
Yoav RamSagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9653-4458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans routinely keep souvenirs objects retained for the memories they evoke, yet the evolutionary and cognitive consequences of mnemonic collecting remain unclear. Existing discussions of curated objects concentrate on later prehistory and modern humans and view such objects at the social level, as carriers of shared cultural meaning or as markers of status. Here, we address an earlier time period and locate the phenomenon at the personal rather than the social level. By integrating archaeology with theories of extended memory and niche construction, we synthesize evidence consistent with systematic curation of items beyond purely utilitarian needs from the terminal Lower Palaeolithic (~500 kya) onward, including transported distinctive stones, fossils, and the prolonged retention of patinated "old" stone tools whose earlier surfaces were deliberately preserved. We propose that curated keepsakes functioned as portable external memory devices. Beyond cueing recall, they may have helped authenticate self-relevant past events by providing durable material traces that support source monitoring-distinguishing experienced from imagined events. As such practices became routine, they could have created a "souvenir niche" in which individuals who better integrated internal recollection with external tokens gained fitness benefits. The token's reference is personal, but its consequences can be social, supporting tasks like tracking alliances, reciprocity, and place-based obligations. These benefits may have strengthened selection on neural systems facilitating the development of autobiographical memory and sense of self via gene-culture coevolution. We outline archaeological, developmental, and experimental predictions that distinguish this mnemonic-authentication account from aesthetic or economic explanations and suggest approaches for testing them. Viewing curated objects as memory technology links early material culture to the evolutionary shaping of human autobiographical memory.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHominidaeMemory, EpisodicAnimalsArchaeologyFossilsHumans

Identifiers

PMID42895355
PMCPMC13679482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.