ReviewEvolutionary anthropology2026
Homo Memorabiliaxis: Souvenirs and the Evolution of Autobiographical Memory and Self.
Review in Evolutionary anthropology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans routinely keep souvenirs objects retained for the memories they evoke, yet the evolutionary and cognitive consequences of mnemonic collecting remain unclear. Existing discussions of curated objects concentrate on later prehistory and modern humans and view such objects at the social level, as carriers of shared cultural meaning or as markers of status. Here, we address an earlier time period and locate the phenomenon at the personal rather than the social level. By integrating archaeology with theories of extended memory and niche construction, we synthesize evidence consistent with systematic curation of items beyond purely utilitarian needs from the terminal Lower Palaeolithic (~500 kya) onward, including transported distinctive stones, fossils, and the prolonged retention of patinated "old" stone tools whose earlier surfaces were deliberately preserved. We propose that curated keepsakes functioned as portable external memory devices. Beyond cueing recall, they may have helped authenticate self-relevant past events by providing durable material traces that support source monitoring-distinguishing experienced from imagined events. As such practices became routine, they could have created a "souvenir niche" in which individuals who better integrated internal recollection with external tokens gained fitness benefits. The token's reference is personal, but its consequences can be social, supporting tasks like tracking alliances, reciprocity, and place-based obligations. These benefits may have strengthened selection on neural systems facilitating the development of autobiographical memory and sense of self via gene-culture coevolution. We outline archaeological, developmental, and experimental predictions that distinguish this mnemonic-authentication account from aesthetic or economic explanations and suggest approaches for testing them. Viewing curated objects as memory technology links early material culture to the evolutionary shaping of human autobiographical memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.