ArticleJournal of global health2026
Prevalence and determinants of probable dementia in rural India: a cross-sectional study in the APCAPS cohort.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dementia poses a growing public health challenge in India. Despite this, epidemiological data on the condition remain largely restricted to adults >60 years of age, despite the convergence of urbanisation-driven cardiometabolic risks and socioeconomic disadvantage in rural India potentially accelerating dementia onset. We investigated the prevalence and determinants of probable dementia in a transitional rural Indian cohort of adults aged ≥45 years. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we utilised data from the Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study cohort from 29 villages near Hyderabad, South India (2021-2023). We collected sociodemographic, occupational, and household asset data through face-to-face, questionnaire-based interviews. Cardiometabolic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and stroke) were assessed using validated methods. Dementia screening was performed using the Brief Community Screening Instrument for Dementia. We calculated prevalence estimates for dementia and used multivariable logistic regression to identify independent associations of probable dementia with sociodemographic, socioeconomic (education, occupation, household assets), and cardiometabolic factors (diabetes, hypertension, cardiac disease, and stroke). Results: The final sample included 2,163 adults aged ≥45 years. The prevalence of probable dementia (a positive screen on the BCSI-D) was 3.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.6-4.6) in the 45-59 age group and 7.4% (95% CI = 6.0-9.4) in the ≥60 age group. In the multivariable model, the odds of probable dementia were 2.2 times higher among unemployed or retired participants than among those working in agriculture or animal rearing (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.23; 95% CI = 1.26-3.95). The odds of probable dementia among literate participants were 0.5 times those among illiterate participants (aOR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.31-0.89). The odds of probable dementia were 3.8 times higher among participants with a history of stroke than among those without (aOR = 3.77; 95% CI = 1.67-7.94). Conclusions: Our results indicate that the burden of probable dementia in rural India extends into middle age, and that the condition itself is independently associated with a history of stroke and socioeconomic disadvantages. This suggests a need to extend cognitive and vascular risk assessment to adults aged ≥45 years in rural India. However, as all findings reflect positive screening results rather than confirmed diagnoses, longitudinal studies with diagnostic confirmation are needed before population-level screening recommendations can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.