ArticleJournal of global health2026
External validation and application of machine learning models for obesity in Chinese children and adolescents per Chinese and WHO growth standards.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Childhood and adolescent obesity is a growing global public health challenge, underscoring the need for reliable tools to identify individuals at high risk. We aimed to develop, validate, and deploy machine learning (ML) models for predicting obesity in children and adolescents aged 3-18 years using multi-domain risk factors per Chinese and World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards, with an online tool for clinical and public health translation. Methods: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study. We used data from 22,555 participants in Beijing (2022, 2024) for training/internal validation, and data from 5,343 participants in Tangshan (2020) for external validation. We defined obesity using both Chinese and WHO growth standards. We analysed 38 features across 5 domains; we selected key predictors using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. We evaluated 4 ML models using 28 performance metrics, with SHapley Additive exPlanations enhancing interpretability. Results: We retained 5 features per the Chinese growth standards and 12 per the WHO growth standards. Age, maternal body mass index (BMI), paternal BMI, screen time, and birthweight were consistent predictors. The neural network achieved optimal performance per Chinese growth standards (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) = 0.735), and eXtreme gradient boosting performed best per WHO growth standards (AUROC = 0.736), with the corresponding external validation AUROCs of 0.699 and 0.707. We subsequently deployed user-friendly online prediction tools for translation. Conclusions: We identified two interpretable ML models for obesity in children and adolescents per both Chinese and WHO growth standards, each demonstrating modest but reliable predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.