ArticleJournal of global health2026
Large-scale plasma proteomic profiling enhances prediction of heart failure among hypertensive individuals: prospective insights from the UK Biobank.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is a major risk factor for heart failure (HF), but current clinical models have limited ability to identify high-risk individuals before overt disease. Plasma proteomics may capture early molecular changes and improve risk prediction. Methods: We analysed 16,128 hypertensive UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project participants without baseline HF. Plasma levels of 2,911 proteins were measured using the Olink Explore platform. Participants were randomly split 1:1 into training and validation sets. HF-associated proteins were identified using Cox models in the training set, followed by LASSO regression to construct a protein risk score (PRS). Model performance was assessed in the validation set using Harrell's C-index, time-dependent ROC analysis, Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI), Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI), calibration, and bootstrap validation. A parsimonious panel was derived using LightGBM and sequential forward feature selection. Results: During a median follow-up of 15.1 years, 1,074 participants developed HF. In the training set, 534 proteins were associated with HF after adjustment for demographic and clinical risk factors and were enriched in cytokine signalling, extracellular matrix organisation, and immune-cell migration pathways. The 101-protein PRS was independently associated with incident HF. In the validation set, adding the PRS increased the C-index from 0.670 to 0.786 beyond age and sex, and from 0.727 to 0.787 beyond the Pooled Cohort Equations to Prevent Heart Failure (PCP-HF) model, with improved reclassification and discrimination. PRS levels were elevated years before HF diagnosis. A six-protein panel comprising NT-proBNP, GDF15, BCAN, WFDC2, CTHRC1, and CNTN5 achieved an AUC of 0.775, outperforming NT-proBNP alone. Conclusions: Plasma proteomic profiling improves HF risk prediction among hypertensive individuals beyond conventional clinical factors and may support earlier risk stratification and precision prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.