ReviewThe breast journal2026
Intratumoral Microbiome-Tumor Microenvironment Crosstalk in Breast Cancer Aggressiveness.
Review in The breast journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intratumoral Microbiome-Tumor Microenvironment Crosstalk in Breast Cancer Aggressiveness.The breast journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) remains the most common malignancy among women worldwide, with incidence and mortality rates continuing to rise. Alongside tumor heterogeneity and diverse clinical outcomes, increasing attention has been directed toward the role of the intratumoral microbiome as a regulator of breast tumorigenesis. Recent evidence demonstrates that breast tissue harbors one of the most diverse microbial communities compared with other cancer types, with marked differences between normobiota and malignant tissue. Intratumoral microorganisms are potentially associated with BC progression through multiple mechanisms, including modulation of inflammation, steroid hormone metabolism, and extracellular matrix remodeling. Specific taxa, including Staphylococcus, Bacillus, Fusobacterium, and Paenibacillus, have been associated with tumor aggressiveness, molecular subtypes, and patient prognosis. Moreover, the microbiome actively shapes the tumor microenvironment by altering immune infiltration, inducing resistance to anticancer therapy, and regulating immune checkpoint signaling, including PD-1/PD-L1 pathways. Microbial proteases and bacterial analogs of matrix metalloproteinases further contribute to extracellular matrix degradation and stromal remodeling, enhancing metastatic potential. Despite rapid advances, the clinical utility of intratumoral microbial signatures as predictive biomarkers of BC aggressiveness remains under investigation. Comprehensive characterization of microbial profiles across clinical and molecular subgroups may offer novel diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic opportunities in BC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.