Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42895080›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2026

Rural Versus Urban Distribution of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training and Associated Rural Community Characteristics.

Ryan Spencer, Mukesh Adhikari, Lori Rodefeld, Laney McDougal, AnnaMarie Connolly, Emily M Hawes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Rural Versus Urban Distribution of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training and Associated Rural Community Characteristics.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ryan SpencerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2492-9063
Mukesh AdhikariDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1091-328X
Lori RodefeldThe University of North Carolina Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Laney McDougalAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
AnnaMarie ConnollyAmerican College of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8550-8270
Emily M HawesThe University of North Carolina Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7717-4066

Funding

HRSA HHSU.S. Department of Health and Human Services #75R60224C00016U.S. Department of Health and Human Services #UK6RH32513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the distribution of OB/GYN residency program training sites and compare community characteristics in rural counties with and without training sites.

methodsUsing data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the locations of all accredited obstetrician/gynecologist (OB/GYN) residency training sites for the 2023-2024 academic year (AY 23-24) were geocoded. They were classified as rural or urban according to the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy and Core-Based Statistical Area categories. The percentage of time spent training in rural areas was calculated for each program. Programs with at least 50% rural training were also identified. Bivariate analyses, including Pearson's chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, were conducted using the Area Health Resource File (AHRF, 2022-23) to compare community characteristics between rural counties with and without OB/GYN residency training sites.

resultsIn AY 23-24, there were 294 OB/GYN residency programs utilizing 1052 training sites. There were 19 programs (6.5% of programs) offering a total of 25 training sites in rural areas (2.4% of all training sites). In programs that offered rural training sites, the rural experience accounted for an average of 4.8% of total training time in those programs. Regarding community characteristics, rural counties that did not have a residency training site were less populated than rural counties with a training site (15,742 vs. 50,886; p < 0.001). Compared with rural counties that had an OB/GYN training site, rural counties without a training site had a higher proportion of uninsured people less than 65 years old (8.0% vs. 11.5%; p < 0.001), a higher proportion of uninsured people less than 19 years old (3.8% vs. 6.4%; p < 0.001), lower median number of primary care physicians (40.6 vs. 55.1 per 100,000; p = 0.005), fewer median number of psychiatrists (0.0 vs. 2.5 per 100,000; p < 0.001), and were more likely for the entire county be a mental Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA; 35.3% vs. 69.0%; p<0.001).

conclusionOB/GYN residency training is highly urbanized. There are significantly less favorable health care access characteristics in rural counties without an OB/GYN residency training site compared to those with residency training sites. The findings identify rural communities without OB/GYN training sites that may represent opportunities for future rural training expansion. A comprehensive strategy to increase rural OB/GYN training experiences may increase the number of rural obstetricians.

Indexed as

GynecologyInternship and ResidencyObstetricsRural Health ServicesRural PopulationUrban PopulationFemaleHumansUnited StatesWorkforcehealth servicesinternship and residencyrural health

Identifiers

PMID42895080
PMCPMC13678571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.