Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42895068›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2026

Development and Initial Psychometric Validation of a Nurse-Assessed Discharge Readiness Scale for Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Xingxing Mo, Ting Liang, Juejin Li, Xuan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xingxing MoDepartment of Cardiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, uestc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8804-2642
Ting LiangDepartment of Cardiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, uestc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0216-7141
Juejin LiDepartment of Nursing, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, uestc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-3204
Xuan WangDepartment of Cardiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, uestc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8215-5554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) face multiple disease- and treatment-related self-management demands after discharge. Accurate assessment of discharge readiness is essential for identifying areas in which patients may require additional discharge education and transitional care support. The widely used Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) assesses overall discharge readiness across four domains: personal status, knowledge, coping ability and expected support. As a generic instrument, however, its broadly framed items may not adequately capture PCI-specific aspects of readiness, including treatment adherence, puncture-site healing, recognition of warning symptoms and preparedness for cardiac rehabilitation.

objectiveTo develop and initially validate a nurse-assessed Discharge Readiness Scale for Patients with CHD Following PCI (DRS-CHD-PCI).

methodsA multistage instrument development and validation study was conducted. Candidate items were generated using transition theory, a targeted review of relevant literature, clinical guidelines and existing discharge-readiness instruments, and semistructured interviews with patients with CHD following PCI and with healthcare professionals. Items were refined through two rounds of Delphi expert consultations and a pilot test with 20 patients. During psychometric validation, nurses assessed 444 patients on the planned discharge day; assessments took approximately 10-15 min. The sample was randomly split into two subsamples for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Psychometric evaluation included item analysis, content validity, structural validity, convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency and split-half reliability.

resultsThe final scale comprised 17 items across five dimensions. Exploratory factor analysis supported a five-factor structure that explained 75.84% of the total variance. Both the first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis models showed acceptable fit. Cronbach's α was 0.945 for the total scale and ranged from 0.813 to 0.894 across the five dimensions.

conclusionsThe DRS-CHD-PCI is a 17-item, five-dimensional scale with initial evidence supporting its content validity, structural validity and internal consistency. Further multicentre longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate its predictive validity and clinical utility and to determine how its scores can be meaningfully interpreted in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The DRS-CHD-PCI may assist nursing managers and cardiovascular nursing teams by providing a structured, assessment of discharge readiness before discharge and informing nurse-led transitional care planning following PCI. Lower total or dimension scores may highlight areas in which patients require further clinical assessment, additional education, or follow-up.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseNursesPatient DischargePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPsychometricsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescoronary heart diseasedischarge readinessinstrument developmentpercutaneous coronary interventionpsychometric validationtransitional care

Identifiers

PMID42895068
PMCPMC13678577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.