SynthesisJournal of diabetes2026
Detection and Risk Prediction of Diabetes Related Kidney Disease Using Retinal Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Detection and Risk Prediction of Diabetes Related Kidney Disease Using Retinal Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of diabetes · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to determine the effectiveness of deep learning models for detecting and predicting diabetes related kidney disease (DRKD) using two-dimensional retinal images.
methodsA systematic review was conducted across eight databases from inception to July 14, 2026. Eligible cross-sectional and longitudinal studies assessed deep learning models for DRKD detection or prediction using retinal images alone, clinical data alone, or hybrid models. Data on study design, model development, validation, and performance metrics were extracted, with study quality appraised using QUADAS-2 and post hoc, PROBAST+AI. Results were synthesized narratively, with random effects meta analysis for hybrid models.
resultsOf 367 studies, six met inclusion criteria. Three cross-sectional studies of hybrid models contributed to the meta-analysis for DRKD detection, yielding pooled AUC 0.88, sensitivity 0.80, and specificity 0.81, though heterogeneity was high (I2 93.7%-99.8%). Three further studies were synthesized narratively rather than pooled: two cross-sectional studies used more severe or narrower CKD case definitions (AUC 0.86 and 0.96 respectively), and only one longitudinal study predicted the 5-year risk of DRKD (AUC 0.81, sensitivity 0.70, and specificity 0.77). External validation showed hybrid models consistently outperformed retinal-only (ΔAUC 0.03-0.11), but their advantage over clinical-only models was inconsistent.
conclusionDeep learning models may be useful for detecting and predicting DRKD from retinal images, with or without clinical data. However, the small number of heterogenous studies restricts generalizability. Future work should prioritize robust model development, and validation using large, diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.