Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42895056›Full record

SynthesisJournal of diabetes2026

Detection and Risk Prediction of Diabetes Related Kidney Disease Using Retinal Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Samuel Ato Gyasi Otabir, Teketo Kassaw Tegegne, Paul Nderitu, Jiangtao Wang, Jonathan E Shaw, David Owens, Rebecca Thomas, Robyn Jennifer Tapp, Ralph Maddison

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samuel Ato Gyasi OtabirCentre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4295-6443
Teketo Kassaw TegegneInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9137-3632
Paul NderituKing's Ophthalmology Research Unit (KORU), Section of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8571-0751
Jiangtao WangSchool of Computing, Engineering & Digital Technologies, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8704-502X
Jonathan E ShawBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-2203
David OwensDiabetes Research Group, Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1002-1238
Rebecca ThomasDiabetes Research Group, Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2970-6352
Robyn Jennifer TappCentre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8553-2684
Ralph MaddisonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-5518

Funding

Deakin University Postgraduate Research ScholarshipDiabetes UK 23/0006601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to determine the effectiveness of deep learning models for detecting and predicting diabetes related kidney disease (DRKD) using two-dimensional retinal images.

methodsA systematic review was conducted across eight databases from inception to July 14, 2026. Eligible cross-sectional and longitudinal studies assessed deep learning models for DRKD detection or prediction using retinal images alone, clinical data alone, or hybrid models. Data on study design, model development, validation, and performance metrics were extracted, with study quality appraised using QUADAS-2 and post hoc, PROBAST+AI. Results were synthesized narratively, with random effects meta analysis for hybrid models.

resultsOf 367 studies, six met inclusion criteria. Three cross-sectional studies of hybrid models contributed to the meta-analysis for DRKD detection, yielding pooled AUC 0.88, sensitivity 0.80, and specificity 0.81, though heterogeneity was high (I2 93.7%-99.8%). Three further studies were synthesized narratively rather than pooled: two cross-sectional studies used more severe or narrower CKD case definitions (AUC 0.86 and 0.96 respectively), and only one longitudinal study predicted the 5-year risk of DRKD (AUC 0.81, sensitivity 0.70, and specificity 0.77). External validation showed hybrid models consistently outperformed retinal-only (ΔAUC 0.03-0.11), but their advantage over clinical-only models was inconsistent.

conclusionDeep learning models may be useful for detecting and predicting DRKD from retinal images, with or without clinical data. However, the small number of heterogenous studies restricts generalizability. Future work should prioritize robust model development, and validation using large, diverse populations.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetic NephropathiesRetinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPredictive Learning ModelsRisk Assessmentartificial intelligencedeep learningdetectiondiabetes kidney diseasefundus photographspredictionretinal images

Identifiers

PMID42895056
PMCPMC13678574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.