Observational studyJournal of oral & facial pain and headache2026
Clinical outcomes and safety of Five Element Acupuncture for preventive treatment of primary headache disorders: a multi-center real-world longitudinal observational study.
Observational study in Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo observe the real-world association of Five Element Acupuncture (FEA) with symptom improvement when used for the preventive treatment of primary headache disorders.
methodsThis prospective case series study was conducted across multiple centers in China. Patients diagnosed with migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), or trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third Edition (ICHD-3), received standardized FEA treatment once every 1-2 weeks for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week follow-up. Outcomes included headache days per 4 weeks, headache frequency, headache intensity (visual analog scale, VAS), total analgesic units, and headache-related quality of life (Headache Impact Test-6, HIT-6). Safety was assessed by recording acupuncture-related adverse events (AEs). Linear mixed models were used for analysis.
resultsNinety-three participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Headache days were significantly reduced from baseline to the 12-week treatment (
conclusionsThis real-world exploratory observational study suggests that FEA is associated with significant improvements in headache days, headache frequency, headache intensity, analgesic use, and quality of life, with sustained effects noted during follow-up. These findings provide preliminary observational evidence that may inform the design of future randomized controlled trials. CLINICAL
trial registrationRegistration No.: ChiCTR2200061878.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.