SynthesisJournal of oral & facial pain and headache2026
Compartment-specific redox modulation in migraine with aura: a systematic review of context-dependent mechanisms.
Synthesis in Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreventive therapies for migraine with aura (MA) remain suboptimal, with 37-54% of patients failing to achieve a >50% reduction in migraine days despite calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapies, while broad-spectrum antioxidants show inconsistent benefits. This gap suggests that indiscriminate reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging is insufficient, but emerging evidence indicates that ROS function as compartment-specific signaling molecules rather than uniform toxins. Whether this compartment-specific redox modulation occurs within the cortical spreading depression (CSD) cascade and contributes to the limited efficacy of antioxidant therapies remains unclear. We synthesized preclinical evidence to characterize CSD-redox interactions and identify the translational gap limiting precision strategies for MA.
methodsWe systematically searched five databases through June 2025 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk-of-bias tool. Given the anticipated heterogeneity, a qualitative synthesis was conducted.
resultsThirteen studies (594 animals, 85% male) were included. CSD-evoked ROS were associated with transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1)/CGRP signaling and oxidative wavefront propagation. Under bioenergetic stress, ROS accumulation was associated with metabolic collapse, which may trigger CSD onset. Microglial M1-like polarization was associated with reduced CSD thresholds. High-dose melatonin accelerated CSD propagation without improving oxidative markers, suggesting limitations of global antioxidant strategies rather than invalidation of the redox framework. Cell-specific protective mechanisms emerged through microglial M2a-like polarization and compartment-specific stabilization of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1).
conclusionCSD-redox interactions represent a context-dependent reciprocal axis. Clinical failure of broad-spectrum scavengers may reflect disruption of oxidative eustress. Modulators of microglial M2a-like phenotype and compartment-specific bioenergetic stabilizers should be prioritized for future drug development. Intranasal IGF-1 represents a potentially translatable strategy for attenuating trigeminal CGRP release and oxidative markers, although this requires validation in female cohorts and assessment of sex-specific effects. THE PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD420251143073.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.