Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894877›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Context shapes action understanding in social interactions.

Johannes Keck, Kazuyuki Sato, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johannes KeckDepartment for the Psychology of Human Movement and Sport, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Kazuyuki SatoDepartment for the Psychology of Human Movement and Sport, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Rouwen Cañal-BrulandDepartment for the Psychology of Human Movement and Sport, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In social interactions, individuals anticipate what others are about to do next, enabling smooth social interactions and coexistence in daily life. Here, we examined how kinematic and contextual cues are weighted and integrated to predict an interactor's actions during dynamic, real-time competitive interactions. We analyzed 76 participants (38 dyads) freely playing 300 games of rock-paper-scissors each while tracking their kinematics using motion capture. Although movement kinematics consistently conveyed intention-related information, successful action selection depended primarily on how this information influenced predictions. Reinforcement-learning based contextual inference emerged as the strongest predictor of single-trial success and modulated the degree to which movement-derived predictions guided behavior. When contextual and movement-derived information afforded different actions, prioritizing contextual inference consistently outperformed movement-derived predictions. Thus, successful social action understanding depends not on maximizing sensitivity to movement cues, but on adaptively arbitrating between movement-derived and outcome-based contextual information during ongoing social interaction.

Indexed as

adaptive mentalizationanticipationcontextdecision-makingintentionkinematic codingreinforcement learningrock-paper-scissorssocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID42894877
PMCPMC13677244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.