Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894874›Full record

ReviewJournal of pathology informatics2026

Agentic AI workflows in anatomic pathology: Opportunities and challenges.

Andy Ngo, Roland Tian, Amin Mohammad, Jenny L Weon, Simone Arvisais-Anhalt, Jacob Minor, Kenneth Youens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andy NgoClinical Informatics Fellowship Program, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, United States of America.
Roland TianDepartment of Pathology, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, United States of America.
Amin MohammadDepartment of Pathology, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, United States of America.
Jenny L WeonDepartment of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Simone Arvisais-AnhaltDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Jacob MinorClinical Informatics Fellowship Program, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, United States of America.
Kenneth YouensClinical Informatics Fellowship Program, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) in anatomic pathology is dominated by image-based diagnostic applications, but much of the specialty's cognitive work is textual: reviewing clinical history, drafting reports, coordinating testing, and communicating results. Large language models can be useful for many of these tasks, and agentic systems extend their capabilities by retrieving external information, invoking software tools, following task-specific instructions, tracking workflow states, and carrying out complex multi-step tasks under human oversight. This conceptual review outlines key components of agentic AI systems including retrieval augmented generation, tool use, skills, and the so-called "agentic loop"-and applies them to anatomic pathology workflows. Three illustrative design sketches use reflex testing support, workload balancing and case routing, and ancillary test decision support to explain how agentic systems can combine lab information system data, trustworthy knowledge sources, local policy, and explicit human approval gates. We examine considerations for clinical deployment, including interoperability and integration challenges, lifecycle governance and validation, security and safety concerns, and cost and sustainability. Agentic AI offers a plausible and constructive near-term vision for AI in pathology: better-supported diagnosis that allows pathologists to spend more of their time on the judgment, accountability, and genuine care that remain distinctly human.

Indexed as

Agentic AIAnatomic pathologyArtificial intelligenceClinical decision supportHuman-in-the-loopLab information systemsLarge language modelsPathology reportingRetrieval-augmented generationWorkflow automation

Identifiers

PMID42894874
PMCPMC13677232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.