ArticleiScience2026
Dissociable pupil-linked arousal during overt and inner speech.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inner (covert) speech, the silent production of language in one's mind, plays a central role in human cognition and engages speech-related cortical networks partly overlapping with those for overt speech. Because cortical language processing unfolds within arousal states set by the ascending systems, we asked whether inner and overt speech are accompanied by similar pupil-linked arousal patterns. Using pupillometry across three counting-task experiments, we found a dissociation between inner and overt speech. While overt speech consistently elicited pupil dilation across conditions, inner speech produced a variable dilation profile relative to baseline: pupil constriction (simple counting), no deviation (noun-phrase counting), and clear dilation (step counting; high cognitive load). Importantly, pupil size during inner speech remained smaller than that during overt speech despite task-dependent dynamics. These findings suggest that task-elicited inner speech is accompanied by lower pupil-linked arousal than overt speech, adding a state-level physiological dimension to cortical accounts of verbal processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.