ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Microplastics, nanoplastics, and thrombogenesis.
Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) are produced through mechanical, chemical, and ultraviolet-mediated degradation of plastics and may enter the human bloodstream via ingestion, inhalation, dermal exposure, and iatrogenic sources. Their detection in human blood, atheromas, and thrombi has raised concerns that they may contribute to thrombogenesis. We conducted a structured narrative review of English-language studies indexed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus over the preceding 15 years, up to March 31, 2026. The search identified 981 database records and 39 additional manually identified articles; after removing duplicates and screening, 72 articles were included. Evidence was synthesized according to Virchow's triad, focusing on endothelial injury, altered blood flow, hypercoagulability, cellular uptake, polymer type, surface charge, weathering, and protein corona formation. MNPs may contribute to all 3 components of Virchow's triad. Proposed mechanisms include oxidative endothelial injury, glycocalyx disruption, monocyte adhesion, foam-cell formation, plaque instability, immune cell-mediated microvascular obstruction, platelet activation, NETosis, von Willebrand factor interactions, factor XII activation, thrombin generation, and fibrin-rich clot stabilization. These effects appear to vary with particle size, polymer composition, surface charge, and environmental weathering. However, mechanistic evidence largely comes from polystyrene nanoparticle models, whereas human thrombus and atheroma studies more commonly detect polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride. MNPs are biologically plausible contributors to thrombogenesis, but their clinical relevance remains uncertain. Prospective human studies, standardized contamination-controlled detection methods, and dose-response experiments using clinically relevant particles and concentrations are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.