ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
The Recognition-to-Practice Gap: Physicians' Approaches to Osteoporosis Assessment and Management in COPD.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis is a common yet frequently under-recognised comorbidity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet its integration into routine COPD care remains poorly understood. This study evaluated physicians' perceptions, confidence, clinical practices, perceived barriers, and factors associated with routine osteoporosis risk assessment. Methods: A national cross-sectional survey of general practitioners, pulmonologists, and critical care physicians practising in Saudi Arabia between October 2025 and March 2026 was conducted. The questionnaire assessed physicians' perceptions, confidence, osteoporosis-related clinical practices, and perceived barriers. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with routine osteoporosis risk assessment. Results: A total of 977 physicians participated. Most physicians recognised osteoporosis as an important comorbidity in COPD and agreed that it increases the risk of fractures, falls, and impaired lung function. Although 61.0% reported routinely assessing osteoporosis risk, several practices were inconsistently implemented, including fracture risk assessment and referral for bone health evaluation. Physicians generally reported moderate-to-high confidence in recognising and managing osteoporosis; however, gaps remained in identifying at-risk patients. The most frequently reported barriers were prioritisation of respiratory symptoms (58.9%), lack of clinical protocols (55.1%), limited consultation time (51.1%), and restricted access to diagnostic resources (51.1%). In multivariate analysis, pulmonologists (AOR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.18), physicians managing 10-30 COPD patients monthly (AOR=1.70, 95% CI: 1.20-2.40), formal training (AOR=1.45, 95% CI: 1.04-2.03), and self-reported knowledge (AOR=1.71, 95% CI: 1.22-2.39) were independently associated with routine osteoporosis assessment. Conclusion: Despite favourable perceptions and moderate-to-high confidence, osteoporosis risk assessment remains inconsistently integrated into COPD care. Educational initiatives and standardised clinical pathways may help improve the recognition and management of osteoporosis in patients with COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.