Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894798›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2026

Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation in adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit.

Vincent Labbé, Nadia Aissaoui, Pierre Asfar, François Bagate, Simon Bourcier, Stephane Ederhy, Julie Helms, Sami Hraiech, Jérémie Joffre, Adrien Joseph and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vincent LabbéDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Nadia AissaouiDepartment of Cardiology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Pierre AsfarMédecine Intensive Réanimation et Médecine Hyperbare, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
François BagateUniversité Paris-Est, Groupe de Recherche Clinique GR05 CARMAS, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM, Créteil, France.
Simon BourcierService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Île-de-France, Melun, France.
Stephane EderhyDepartment of Pharmacology, Sorbonne Université, INSERM CIC-2503, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Julie HelmsMedicine Faculty, Medical Intensive Care Unit NHC, Strasbourg University, University Hospital Federation (FHU) TARGET, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Sami HraiechService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, AP-HM, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Jérémie JoffreSorbonne Université, Assistance Publqiue Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.
Adrien JosephMédecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne, France.
Khaldoun KuteifanService de Réanimation Médicale GHRMSA, 68100, Mulhouse, France.
Armand Mekontso DessapUniversité Paris-Est, Groupe de Recherche Clinique GR05 CARMAS, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM, Créteil, France.
Sebastien PreauDivision of Intensive Care, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Louise-Marie JandeauxMedicine Faculty, Medical Intensive Care Unit NHC, Strasbourg University, University Hospital Federation (FHU) TARGET, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most existing recommendations for atrial fibrillation are derived from cardiology settings. However, atrial fibrillation is also highly prevalent among patients admitted to intensive care units and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Therefore, its management in this specific context warrants dedicated guidance. To address this need, The French Intensive Care Society has developed formalized expert recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Twenty-four questions addressing the management of atrial fibrillation were evaluated in adult patients admitted to intensive care units. Of these, twenty-one focused specifically on new-onset atrial fibrillation, one addressed pre-existing atrial fibrillation, and two were applicable to both conditions. The assessment encompassed the role of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, the management of potentially reversible triggers (optimization of fluid status, magnesium supplementation, serum potassium targets, and screening for thyroid dysfunction…), strategies for mitigating hemodynamic risk (indications and modalities for rhythm and rate control), and the management of thrombotic risk (indications, regimens, and duration of therapeutic anticoagulation). Eighteen recommendations were formulated, all of which achieved strong agreement among the expert panel. Only two recommendations were supported by a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+), whereas the remaining sixteen relied on evidence that could not be classified within the GRADE framework and were therefore issued as expert opinions. For six additional aspects of atrial fibrillation management, the experts concluded that the available evidence was insufficient to support the formulation of a reliable recommendation.

Indexed as

AnticoagulationAtrial fibrillationCritically ill patientsGuidelinesIntensive care unitRate controlRhythm control

Identifiers

PMID42894798
PMCPMC13676918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.