ArticleCureus2026
Unmasking Brugada Syndrome With Oral Propafenone in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a cardiac channelopathy predisposing patients to malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the absence of structural heart disease. The diagnosis requires documentation of a type 1 Brugada electrocardiographic pattern, which can be unmasked using sodium channel-blocking agents in symptomatic patients presenting with non-diagnostic baseline patterns. We report a case of a 24-year-old male patient with a history of unexplained syncope who exhibited a non-diagnostic type 2 Brugada pattern on a baseline electrocardiogram (ECG). Due to the local unavailability of standard intravenous antiarrhythmics, a pharmacological provocation test was conducted using a single 600 mg oral dose of propafenone. Under continuous cardiac monitoring, the patient safely developed a diagnostic type 1 "coved" electrocardiographic pattern starting at the third hour, confirming the diagnosis of BrS. The ECG returned to its baseline pattern eight hours after the initiation of the test, and no cardiovascular complications occurred. This case highlights the clinical utility and safety of oral propafenone as an effective alternative diagnostic challenge for unmasking BrS in resource-limited environments. Furthermore, it emphasizes the necessity of utilizing extended monitoring protocols due to the specific pharmacokinetic profile and delayed onset of action of oral agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.