Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894781›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2026

Current state and future directions of nursing and allied health research in implantable left ventricular assist devices.

Jessie M Casida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jessie M CasidaProfessor and PhD in Nursing Science Program Leader, Margaret Randolph Research and Innovation Scholar, Mennonite College of Nursing, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: No information describing the synthesis of studies surrounding "non-medical" management of LVAD patients and caregivers, mostly done by nurses or allied health professionals. This article provides an overview of the current state of published research in nursing and allied health disciplines, as well as its future directions. Methods: A state-of-the-art literature review, drawing on the author's reflexivity and research expertise with LVAD patients, caregivers, and nurses, was employed. Results: Themes emerged from the review of "non-medical" studies were clustered around the nursing metaparadigm's four core concepts: Conclusion: Despite the inherent limitations of this review, the current state of the science produced by nurses and allied health professionals is in its formative stage. Both professional groups are well-positioned to advance science by understanding the mechanisms through which patient, caregiver, and provider (i.e., nurses and allied health professionals) "factors" affect LVAD treatment outcomes beyond engineering and medical models. Finally, the article serves as a platform for reflective practice and a catalyst for collaboration to produce LVAD research that is responsive to the roles and scopes of practice of nursing and allied health professionals in long-term LVAD care.

Indexed as

allied health professionalsLVAD therapynursingresearchstate-of-the-science

Identifiers

PMID42894781
PMCPMC13677032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.