ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor masquerading as carcinoma.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm that can closely mimic malignancy on imaging, particularly in the lung where spiculated, fluorodeoxyglucose-avid nodules frequently raise suspicion for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of its overlapping radiographic features and variable molecular alterations, IMT often requires surgical resection for definitive diagnosis and treatment. We report a 54-year-old man with a spiculated, PET-avid left upper lobe pulmonary nodule incidentally discovered on surveillance imaging. He was asymptomatic, with no smoking history but a family history of lung cancer. Percutaneous biopsy was nondiagnostic, prompting robotic-assisted wedge resection with lymph node dissection. Gross examination revealed a 10 mm well-circumscribed lesion, and histopathologic analysis demonstrated spindle-shaped myofibroblastic cells within a lymphoplasmacytic background. Immunohistochemistry was positive for ALK-1, desmin, actin, myosin, and STAT6, confirming IMT. Surgical margins and all mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes were negative for malignancy. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated, and he was discharged the following day with no residual symptoms. This case underscores the diagnostic challenge of IMT, which can radiographically and clinically resemble primary lung carcinoma. When noninvasive evaluation is inconclusive, surgical excision provides both diagnosis and cure. Clinicians should consider IMT in the differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules, particularly in nonsmokers, and incorporate molecular testing to guide management and avoid unnecessary aggressive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.