Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894768›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Impact of Short-Term Fluoride Supplementation in Pregnancy on the Maternal Microbiome, Pregnancy, and Neonatal Outcomes: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Anna M Powell, Kim Jones-Beatty, Laura M Ensign, Kevin M Delong, Irina Burd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna M PowellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Kim Jones-BeattyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, USA.
Laura M EnsignThe Center for Nanomedicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Kevin M DelongThe Center for Nanomedicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Irina BurdDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction This report presents secondary, exploratory analyses of a double-blind randomized trial originally designed to determine whether fluoride supplementation during pregnancy reduced preterm birth (PTB). The trial was terminated early because of enrollment difficulties and was not powered for its original clinical endpoint. We therefore examined whether randomized fluoride supplementation was associated with oral or vaginal microbiome composition and descriptively evaluated gestational and neonatal outcomes. Methodology In the original double-blind randomized controlled trial, pregnant participants at 10-20 weeks of gestation were assigned to a daily capsule containing 3 mg fluoride or an otherwise comparable prenatal vitamin. Of 319 screened individuals, 47 were eligible, and 30 participants completed follow-up through delivery. Maternal urine, oral swabs, and vaginal swabs were collected during the second and third trimesters and at delivery. The V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was sequenced from oral and vaginal specimens. The present secondary analyses compared microbiome composition and diversity by treatment assignment and descriptively examined gestational and neonatal outcomes. Results Urine fluoride concentration differed between groups at the second-trimester assessment but not at later assessments. No differences in vaginal microbiome richness or diversity were observed between treatment groups. Several oral taxa, including

Indexed as

fluoride supplementationoral microbiomepregnancy surveillancepreterm labourvaginal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID42894768
PMCPMC13676891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.