Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894761›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2026

The effect of time-varying left ventricular ejection fraction on clinical outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

M S Chew, S Jansson, M Jozwiak, Z Hassanzadeh, H Didriksson, C Jonsson, H Andersson, M Åström Aneq, M Slama, A Vieillard Baron and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

M S ChewDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
S JanssonDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
M JozwiakService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice Hôpital Archet 1, Nice, France.
Z HassanzadehDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
H DidrikssonDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive care, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
C JonssonDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive care, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
H AnderssonDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive care, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
M Åström AneqDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
M SlamaIntensive Care Unit, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, Amiens, France.
A Vieillard BaronMedical and Surgical ICU, University Hospital Ambroise Pare, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
P VignonMedical Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
H ZhangMalmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
S HuangIntensive Care Medicine, Nepean Hospital, NBMLHD, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and acute cor pulmonale are associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19, the prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction remains insufficiently characterized. In particular, dynamic changes in cardiac function during intensive care has seldom been studied. We therefore investigated the association between time-varying LV systolic function, assessed by LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in patients with COVID-19, taking into account right ventricular function and forward flow. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study combined three ICU data repositories comprising 808 patients with 1614 echocardiographic examinations. Time-varying LV systolic function (LVEF ≤ 50%, 51-70%, >70%) was the primary exposure, and ICU mortality was the outcome. Multivariable Cox models with time-varying covariates, including, acute cor pulmonale, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and key clinical characteristics were used to assess associations between LV systolic function phenotypes and outcome. Results: At baseline, 27% of patients had abnormal LV systolic function (LVEF ≤ 50%) and 17% had hyperdynamic LV function (LVEF > 70%). The proportion of patients with normal LV systolic function increased over time. Abnormal LV systolic function was most prevalent at the first echocardiographic examination (27%) and least prevalent at the fifth examination (17%), whereas hyperdynamic LV function became more frequent during ICU stay, peaking at the 4th echocardiographic examination. Abnormal (aHR; 1.174, 95% CI: 0.901-1.531) or hyperdynamic (aHR: 1.041, 95% CI: 0.785-1.379) LV systolic dysfunction was not independently associated with ICU mortality. Conclusion: In critically ill patients with COVID-19, LV systolic dysfunction, including both abnormal and hyperdynamic LV phenotypes, were common and dynamic during ICU stay. LV systolic dysfunction was not independently associated with ICU mortality when modelled longitudinally and adjusted for RV dysfunction, forward flow and other clinical covariates. These findings suggest that the prognostic value LVEF phenotypes in severe COVID-19 may be limited. Further studies incorporating more sensitive measures of LV function and biomarkers of myocardial injury may be required to delineate subtle changes not captured by LVEF.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical careEchocardiographyICU mortalityLeft ventricular function

Identifiers

PMID42894761
PMCPMC13677176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.