ReviewCureus2026
Treatment Strategies for Achieving and Maintaining Low-Risk Status in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving and maintaining low-risk status is now the main treatment goal in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), but the evidence connecting individual treatment strategies with low-risk attainment and long-term outcomes is scattered across trials, registries, and cohorts that use different risk tools. We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. PubMed, Scopus, Dimensions, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to August 27, 2026, for studies of adults with Group 1 PAH that evaluated a treatment strategy and reported a validated risk-stratification outcome. Results were synthesised narratively under the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline, with certainty graded using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Forty-eight reports were included: 10 randomised or prospective interventional studies, 12 secondary analyses of trial data, and 26 observational cohorts. Few patients reached low risk under any strategy, and fewer than half did so after upfront dual oral therapy in most cohorts. Prostacyclin-pathway therapy improved risk status across oral, inhaled, and parenteral routes, although the clearest survival advantage came from parenteral regimens in registry data. Add-on sotatercept improved functional, haemodynamic, and composite clinical outcomes, and these gains were largely sustained at one year. Low-risk status predicted survival, yet it often did not last, and the risk category reached at the first annual review strongly predicted later course. In mediation analyses, change in risk score accounted for only part of the treatment effect, and studies disagreed on whether patients already at low risk benefit from further treatment. Low-risk status is a valuable treatment target and prognostic marker, but it has not been validated as a surrogate endpoint. Early, repeated risk assessment and prompt escalation during the first year after diagnosis are supported by the available evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.