ReviewCureus2026
Potential Use of AI Chatbots by Patients With Bowel Tumors: Opportunities and Implications for Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bowel tumors and colorectal cancer (CRC), in particular, have become a major concern to the global health community and have led to high morbidity and mortality levels, especially in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This narrative review examines the potential roles of patient-facing AI chatbots and large language model (LLM)-based conversational tools across bowel tumor care, with particular attention to their potential applicability, limitations, and implementation requirements in LMICs. The available evidence spans small prospective and feasibility studies of patient-facing symptom monitoring or education as well as studies evaluating LLM performance in simulated clinical scenarios and clinician-facing decision support. Among the 16 studies, three were conducted in middle-income countries, and none in low-income countries; most evidence therefore arose from high-income settings. Patient-facing interventions generally support feasibility, acceptability, symptom reporting, and communication, whereas accuracy and concordance for screening, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations vary by task and are less reliable in complex cases. These findings support chatbots primarily as adjuncts to structured clinical care rather than autonomous clinical decision-making tools. AI chatbots may complement bowel tumor care through education, symptom monitoring, communication, and selected decision-support functions, but current evidence does not establish broad clinical effectiveness or safety, particularly in LMICs. Prospective validation, human oversight, privacy safeguards, local-language and cultural adaptation, digital-access considerations, and context-specific implementation studies are needed before wider clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.