ReviewCureus2026
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in Athletes: Optimizing Athletic Performance and Sleep Quality Through Neuromodulation.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromodulation is a procedure relying on the delivery of specific stimuli to selected sites of the nervous system and hereby influencing its activity. Even though the underlying neurobiological mechanisms are not yet fully elucidated and the research is still ongoing, neuromodulation is already being used as an intervention for various mental conditions and insomnia, or it may even improve the physical performance of athletes. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on the effects of specific neuromodulation techniques on performance and sleep quality in athletes, focusing on cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant articles. All types of publications were taken into account, but original studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and meta-analyses were given priority. Current evidence shows that while tDCS may improve athletic performance, especially endurance and sport-specific skills, its impact on sleep in athletes is inconclusive. This method may increase subjectively reported total sleep time and subjective sleep quality, but no objective improvement has been demonstrated. CES findings are preliminary: evidence from the small trials suggests improvement of selected objective sleep parameters, but the evidence base is limited to two small studies, one of which lacked a sham condition. In conclusion, non-invasive neuromodulation methods, specifically tDCS and CES, may impact athletic performance and help treat sleep disorders in athletes. Neuromodulation should not be viewed as a standalone method, but rather a complementary tool to other known interventions for insomnia in athletes. Although the aforementioned techniques show promising results, the research on this topic is limited and requires further evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.