Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894723›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026

Application of Machine Learning Models to Predict Tigecycline Exposure in Critically Ill Patients Using Different Limited Sampling Strategies.

Anran Dai, Hao Liu, Bo Yang, Feiyue Zheng, Yan Guan, Jieqiong Liu, Jianping Zhu, Gang Liang, Yi Yang, Lingyan Yu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anran Dai *Department of Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hao Liu *State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Key Laboratory of Drug Metabolism, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9627-6033
Bo Yang *Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1572-9764
Feiyue ZhengDepartment of Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yan GuanDepartment of Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jieqiong LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jianping ZhuDepartment of Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6923-9584
Gang LiangDepartment of Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yi YangDepartment of Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Lingyan YuDepartment of pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7828-139X
Yuhua ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhenwei YuDepartment of Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3776-2290

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The high variability in the pharmacokinetics of tigecycline may impact therapeutic efficacy, particularly in critically ill patients. This study introduces machine learning (ML) methods, aiming to clarify their effectiveness in individualized drug exposure prediction and determine the optimal modeling strategy. Methods: The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to screen the covariates. Four ML models, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, and long short-term memory network (LSTM), were trained and tested using 751 concentrations from 98 patients in the pharmacokinetic dataset to predict the area under the steady-state plasma concentration-time curve within 24 hours (AUC Results: Seven covariates were screened out by LASSO method, including total bilirubin, creatinine clearance, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, body mass index, serum creatinine, age, and prothrombin time. Internal validation showed that, among the four ML models, the LSTM model performed the best, with the combination of covariates and the plasma concentration feature "C Conclusion: The LSTM model established in this study enables an accurate estimate of tigecycline AUC

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessMachine LearningTigecyclineAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansLong Short Term MemoryMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestAnti-Bacterial AgentsTigecyclinearea under curvemachine learningprecision medicinetigecyclinetrough concentration

Identifiers

PMID42894723
PMCPMC13676858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.