ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026
Application of Machine Learning Models to Predict Tigecycline Exposure in Critically Ill Patients Using Different Limited Sampling Strategies.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The high variability in the pharmacokinetics of tigecycline may impact therapeutic efficacy, particularly in critically ill patients. This study introduces machine learning (ML) methods, aiming to clarify their effectiveness in individualized drug exposure prediction and determine the optimal modeling strategy. Methods: The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to screen the covariates. Four ML models, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, and long short-term memory network (LSTM), were trained and tested using 751 concentrations from 98 patients in the pharmacokinetic dataset to predict the area under the steady-state plasma concentration-time curve within 24 hours (AUC Results: Seven covariates were screened out by LASSO method, including total bilirubin, creatinine clearance, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, body mass index, serum creatinine, age, and prothrombin time. Internal validation showed that, among the four ML models, the LSTM model performed the best, with the combination of covariates and the plasma concentration feature "C Conclusion: The LSTM model established in this study enables an accurate estimate of tigecycline AUC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.