ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Capillary hemangioma of the breast presenting as a new mass on screening mammography: A case report with imaging-pathology correlation.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capillary hemangioma of the breast is a rare benign vascular lesion that may be detected as a new mass at screening mammography. We report a 74-year-old asymptomatic woman with a newly developed 0.7-cm mass in the posterior left breast. Diagnostic mammography showed an oval, equal-density mass with partially obscured margins, and targeted ultrasound demonstrated a 0.6-cm oval, circumscribed, hypoechoic superficial mass with posterior acoustic enhancement and limited internal Doppler flow associated with a feeding vessel. Because the finding was new and indeterminate, it was assessed as BI-RADS 4A and sampled by ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Histologic examination showed a well-circumscribed proliferation of capillary-sized, erythrocyte-containing vessels lined by a single layer of bland, flattened endothelial cells, without cytologic atypia or mitotic activity. D2-40 highlighted background lymphatic vessels but was negative in the lesional channels. No histologic features of angiosarcoma were identified in the sampled tissue. Imaging and pathology were concordant; no surgical excision was performed, and the patient returned to routine annual screening. This case illustrates that interval development may justify biopsy despite relatively benign morphology and that a small capillary hemangioma with benign concordant pathology in an asymptomatic older patient may be managed conservatively while recognizing the sampling limitations of core biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.