ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2026
Hydrogel Microneedles for Perioperative Applications: Drug Delivery, Biosensing, and Theranostic Translation.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrogel microneedles provide access across the skin barrier for drug delivery and interstitial-fluid sampling. Their perioperative use depends on whether that access remains reliable during skin preparation, surgical positioning, and changes in tissue perfusion. This narrative review examines how material design affects delivered dose, measurement accuracy, and clinical feasibility. Human sampling studies establish feasibility for selected measurements; most therapeutic and integrated sensing applications remain at the preclinical stage or have been investigated in other clinical settings. The review distinguishes these findings from evidence in surgical patients. Particular attention is given to insertion and adhesion on disinfected or compromised skin, the relationship between interstitial and plasma measurements, and drug exposure after delivery is interrupted. Short-duration superficial procedures and observational drug or wound-adjacent monitoring offer focused questions for initial studies with standard care maintained. Progress toward treatment requires validation of the complete product, including sterilization, batch consistency, shelf life, and safeguards against uncontrolled release. Clinical studies should report failed applications and adverse events alongside patient outcomes. Autonomous anesthetic administration remains a development goal whose safety cannot be inferred from separate demonstrations of sensing and drug release.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.