ArticleHSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery2026
The Impact of Age and Physical Assessment Measures on Performance Among Non-Weightbearing Walking Aids: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Walking aids for non-weightbearing (NWB) ambulation are often arbitrarily provided with no evidence that physical assessment predicts ambulatory performance. Purpose: We sought to determine if convenient physical assessment measures could guide NWB walking aid prescription and to determine how age impacts ambulatory performance. Methods: This prospective randomized crossover study examined 22 healthy adults, recruited from Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, and surrounding area through flyers and word of mouth. Inclusion criteria were independent unrestricted community dwellers with no self-reported neuromusculoskeletal or cardiovascular conditions who were age 18 years or older. Participants were stratified into 2 age cohorts: younger (age <50 years) and older (age ≥50 years). Physical assessment measures included triceps and latissimus dorsi strength, single lower-limb balance, and arm endurance. Performance measures included distance traversed, rate of perceived exertion, and peak stance limb plantar force (SLPF) evaluated among 4 walking conditions: unaided, NWB with crutches, standard walker, and wheeled knee walker. Two analyses were performed, one using the entire sample population and another split by age. Results: There were no differences in physical assessment measures between the younger and older cohort, yet distance traversed in the older cohort was highly dependent on all physical assessment measures when using crutches or a standard walker. Peak SLPF was reduced in the younger cohort when using the wheeled knee walker, but not in the older cohort. In the younger participants, reducing peak SLPF was highly dependent on arm endurance when using a standard walker or crutches and latissimus dorsi strength when using the wheeled knee walker. Surprisingly, older participants with stronger latissimus dorsi strength reported a higher rate of perceived exertion when using the wheeled knee walker compared to other devices. Conclusion: Arm strength, single lower-limb balance, and arm endurance should be considered when prescribing walking aids in older adults, and the wheeled knee walker should be considered in younger adults in need of reduced peak SLPF. Level of Evidence: Level III, prospective randomized comparative study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.