Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894593›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2026

Reproducible analytical pipelines for healthcare discrete‑event simulation: An open guide and worked examples.

Amy Heather, Thomas Monks, Alison Harper, Fatemeh Alidoost, Robert Challen, Thomas Slater, Navonil Mustafee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy HeatherPeninsula Collaboration for Health Operational Research and Data Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6596-3479
Thomas MonksPeninsula Collaboration for Health Operational Research and Data Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2631-4481
Alison HarperCentre for Simulation, Analytics, and Modelling, University of Exeter Business School, Exeter, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5274-5037
Fatemeh AlidoostCentre for Simulation, Analytics, and Modelling, University of Exeter Business School, Exeter, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0252-560X
Robert ChallenSchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol Faculty of Science and Engineering, Bristol, England, UK.
Thomas SlaterUniversity of Exeter Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Exeter, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0838-7499
Navonil MustafeeCentre for Simulation, Analytics, and Modelling, University of Exeter Business School, Exeter, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrete-event simulation (DES) is a popular technique for exploring problems in healthcare. For these models to be reused and have lasting impact, they need to be reproducible, transparent and well structured. Reproducible analytical pipeline (RAP) approaches are structured robust workflows that ensure analyses can be reproduced. They have emerged as best practice, but modellers struggle to implement them due to gaps in accessible guidance, skills, and time. This paper presents an integrated set of resources designed to help modellers bridge this implementation gap: an open-access e-book and four worked example repositories demonstrating complete RAP workflows for DES in both Python and R. The online book provides step-by-step guidance through nine major sections covering introductory material, project set-up, model inputs, model building, output analysis, experimentation, verification and validation, style and documentation, and collaboration and sharing. The case studies demonstrate varying complexity: a classic M/M/s queueing model, and a replication of a stroke care pathway model. The worked examples serve dual purposes: they demonstrate that RAP principles are achievable for healthcare DES models (from canonical queueing systems to real-world clinical pathways), and they provide templates that modelling teams can adopt and adapt within routine decision-support projects.

Indexed as

Discrete-event simulationhealthcareopen modelsopen sciencereproducibility

Identifiers

PMID42894593
PMCPMC13675625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.