Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894584›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025

Hybrid foundation models: An investigation of foundation anatomy model and foundation segmentation model (FAM-FSM) on thoracic CT images for radiation therapy planning.

Yubing Tong, Lipeng Xie, Dewey Odhner, Tiange Liu, Drew A Torigian, Jayaram K Udupa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yubing TongMedical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Goddard Building, 601W Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Lipeng XieMedical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Goddard Building, 601W Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Dewey OdhnerMedical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Goddard Building, 601W Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Tiange LiuMedical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Goddard Building, 601W Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Drew A TorigianMedical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Goddard Building, 601W Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Jayaram K UdupaMedical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Goddard Building, 601W Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Funding

Models and methods for automatically measuring disease body-wide and staging disease via FDG-PET/CT in LymphomaR01CA255748 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHUSTER, STEPHEN J, TORIGIAN, DREW · 2021 to 2024
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA255748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we investigated a novel hybrid foundation model (HFM) by combining a foundation anatomy model and a foundation segmentation model (FAM-FSM) for automatic object segmentation on thoracic CT images for radiation therapy planning purposes. The HFM framework first performs object recognition and then object delineation for segmentation. The previous hybrid intelligence (HI) segmentation system using natural intelligence through anatomy models to provide recognition results as prompts to FSM enables the combination of existing recognition with the delineation from FSM. SAM-Med2D is adopted as the FSM for segmentation in this study. 249 thoracic CT images are utilized, and 7 objects of interest are assessed in the experiments. 125 data sets from one site are used for fine-tuning FSM, and 104 testing data sets from another 4 different clinical centers are used for testing the performance of segmentation. Different from the typical training strategy used in multi-center deep learning approaches and federated learning, we did not mix data sets from different centers for training purposes in our study. Instead, consistent and strict body region and object definitions as foundational knowledge and guidance were shared and followed by each clinical center in training and testing. HFM achieved promising results from 4 different centers compared to results from FSM using manual ROI prompts. We also show that the existing FSM might not perform well on challenging objects compared to small but specific trained models. The proposed HFM framework can easily integrate any other prompt-based FSMs.

Indexed as

deep learningfoundation anatomy modelfoundation segmentation modelhybrid foundation modelhybrid intelligence

Identifiers

PMID42894584
PMCPMC13676772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.