ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025
Hybrid foundation models: An investigation of foundation anatomy model and foundation segmentation model (FAM-FSM) on thoracic CT images for radiation therapy planning.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we investigated a novel hybrid foundation model (HFM) by combining a foundation anatomy model and a foundation segmentation model (FAM-FSM) for automatic object segmentation on thoracic CT images for radiation therapy planning purposes. The HFM framework first performs object recognition and then object delineation for segmentation. The previous hybrid intelligence (HI) segmentation system using natural intelligence through anatomy models to provide recognition results as prompts to FSM enables the combination of existing recognition with the delineation from FSM. SAM-Med2D is adopted as the FSM for segmentation in this study. 249 thoracic CT images are utilized, and 7 objects of interest are assessed in the experiments. 125 data sets from one site are used for fine-tuning FSM, and 104 testing data sets from another 4 different clinical centers are used for testing the performance of segmentation. Different from the typical training strategy used in multi-center deep learning approaches and federated learning, we did not mix data sets from different centers for training purposes in our study. Instead, consistent and strict body region and object definitions as foundational knowledge and guidance were shared and followed by each clinical center in training and testing. HFM achieved promising results from 4 different centers compared to results from FSM using manual ROI prompts. We also show that the existing FSM might not perform well on challenging objects compared to small but specific trained models. The proposed HFM framework can easily integrate any other prompt-based FSMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.