Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894570›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Evolution of Surgical Flap Delay and Conditioning in Reconstructive Surgery.

Merlin Basheva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Merlin BashevaDepartment of Thermal Trauma, Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Military Medical Academy, Varna, BGR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical delay is a staged technique in which selected vascular connections are interrupted before definitive flap transfer, allowing time for vascular adaptation. This narrative historical review examines its development, experimental physiology, and current use with perfusion assessment, using craniofacial and scalp reconstruction as the principal clinical example. A targeted search of PubMed/MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), publisher archives, and the reference lists of landmark reviews was performed up to August 7, 2026, with emphasis on primary historical reports, mechanistic studies, craniofacial applications, and recent clinical syntheses. The historical record shows three overlapping phases. Early staged reconstructions incorporated deliberate delay before its physiology was understood. Delay then became a reproducible experimental phenomenon, initially explained by denervation, adrenergic recovery, and metabolic adaptation; classic animal studies later demonstrated early increases in flow through dilating and remodeling pre-existing choke vessels. Molecular signaling and capillary neovascularization have been observed in selected tissues and time frames, but their causal contributions remain uncertain. In contemporary practice, conventional surgical delay remains selective rather than routine. Indocyanine green angiography may supplement clinical evaluation and fixed intervals before paramedian forehead flap division; published near-infrared spectroscopy experience in forehead flaps remains limited to two cases. Most evidence consists of animal studies, retrospective series, or small feasibility cohorts, and remote ischemic, pharmacologic, cellular, and exosome-based conditioning remain unproven for routine clinical use. Current evidence does not establish a universal interval, a validated perfusion threshold, or a routine clinical role for newer conditioning methods.

Indexed as

delay phenomenonfacial reconstructionflapflap conditioningparamedian forehead flapplastic surgeryreconstructive surgeryscalp reconstructionsurgical flap delay

Identifiers

PMID42894570
PMCPMC13676680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.