ReviewCureus2026
Functional Brain Imaging in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Emerging Clinical Perspectives.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a leading cause of chronic disability, and the well-documented discordance between structural joint damage and pain experience suggests that central nervous system mechanisms contribute to symptoms independently of peripheral pathology. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has increasingly been used to investigate brain network alterations in KOA, yet the research landscape of this emerging field remains unmapped. We characterized publication trends, collaboration patterns, and methodological characteristics of brain fMRI research in KOA. Following PRISMA 2020 principles adapted for evidence mapping, we searched the Web of Science Core Collection on September 6, 2026, and included 43 English-language original studies (2008-2027) after 2-stage independent screening with chance-adjusted inter-reviewer agreement. Publication output, collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence and burst detection, and paradigm-metric-target coupling were analyzed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the bibliometrix package in R. Annual output fluctuated between one and six publications, peaking at six in 2022. The United States (n = 20) and China (n = 17) were the most productive countries and formed the leading bilateral collaboration dyad. Resting-state fMRI was the most frequently used paradigm (24 studies, 55.8%) and functional connectivity the most frequently applied analytical metric (25 studies, 58.1%); the medial prefrontal cortex (13 studies, 30.2%) and the sensorimotor cortex (12 studies, 27.9%) were the most frequently investigated brain targets. Author-keyword and Keywords Plus analyses yielded complementary thematic structures comprising ten modularity-based clusters (modularity Q = 0.6268, weighted mean silhouette = 0.8522); the most recent keyword bursts (2024 onward) were "pain," "functional connectivity," and the Keywords Plus-derived term "hip." These findings describe publication activity and methodological preferences within the WoSCC-indexed, English-language literature and do not establish the clinical validity of any imaging measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.