Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894510›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2026

Trends in Endoscopic and Open Hip Abductor Tendon Repairs: An Insurance Claims-Based Analysis from 2016 to 2022.

Michael D Greenstein, Genaro D Fullano, Liam A Peebles, Daniel G Whitney, Matthew J Hartwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael D GreensteinUniversity of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.ORCID 0009-0001-3078-4374
Genaro D FullanoUniversity of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Liam A PeeblesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Daniel G WhitneyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Matthew J HartwellDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To report national trends, including rates of open vs endoscopic, in hip abductor tendon repair surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study accessed patient-level insurance claims from adults ≥ 18 years undergoing endoscopic or open gluteal repair from 2016 to 2022 from the IBM Results: 9217 total repairs across the study period were identified: 4504 in the Commercial and 4713 in the Medicare databases. In both datasets, > 50% of repairs occurred in women and the median patient age was > 50 years. The rate of endoscopic gluteal repairs declined from 2016 to 2022: Commercial (2.7 to 1.5 per 100,000 people) and Medicare (5.1 to 2.1 per 100,000 people). The rate of open gluteal repairs increased from 2016 to 2022: Commercial (0.4 to 1.0 per 100,000 people) and Medicare (1.0 to 2.5 per 100,000 people). The occurrence of gluteal repairs combined with arthroscopy or arthroplasty was rare and did not differ significantly between the two databases. Conclusions: Hip abductor tendon repairs were most performed in women and in patients over the age of 50. Across both the commercial and Medicare database, the rate of endoscopic tendon repairs decreased from 2016 to 2022, while open repairs increased. These descriptive trends provide insight into national practice patterns for gluteal tendon tear repairs.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyEndoscopic repairGluteus mediusGluteus minimusMarketscanOpen repair

Identifiers

PMID42894510
PMCPMC13676552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.