ReviewJournal of stroke2026
Genetic Insights Into Cryptogenic Stroke: From Etiologic Heterogeneity to Clinical Translation.
Review in Journal of stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cryptogenic stroke remains challenging because its complex etiology and limited diagnostic tools hinder precise secondary prevention. Growing genetic evidence suggests that cryptogenic stroke may have identifiable genetic architectures that provide additional insights into etiologic classification. In recent years, large-scale genome-wide association studies, multi-omics integration, and other genetic investigations have begun to reveal signals linked to several potential causes, including occult atrial fibrillation and atrial cardiopathy, nonstenotic carotid artery plaque, patent foramen ovale-related paradoxical embolism, monogenic disorders, clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, and cancer-related thrombosis. These findings suggest a possible shift from exclusion-based diagnosis toward a more mechanism-driven approach. Recent genetic discoveries have enabled preliminary work on predictive models for risk stratification. Emerging genetic tools may also offer promising approaches for etiologic stratification and mechanistic investigation. However, current research in this area remains limited by heterogeneous definitions, modest sample sizes, limited ancestral diversity, and gaps in mechanistic and prognostic evidence. Consequently, clinical translation remains at an early stage. Future research should establish larger and more diverse genomic cohorts with longitudinal phenotyping and advance multidimensional data integration. These efforts may refine etiologic classification and support precision treatment in cryptogenic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.