ReviewJournal of stroke2026
Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Molecular Bioengineering to Phase III Pivotal Trials.
Review in Journal of stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase is a primary reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke, yet its clinical utility is constrained by a short half-life, continuous infusion requirements, and susceptibility to plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Tenecteplase, a bioengineered variant of alteplase, was developed to address these limitations through a prolonged half-life, increased fibrin specificity, and enhanced resistance to plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. These structural modifications enable single-bolus administration and reduce systemic fibrinolytic disturbance. In this review, we examine how the targeted molecular modifications of tenecteplase shaped its stepwise translational development in acute ischemic stroke. We first detail the limitations of alteplase, which motivated the transition to alternative agents, the molecular rationale for tenecteplase, and its preclinical evidence. Furthermore, we synthesize the phase II dose-finding trials that established 0.25 mg/kg as providing the optimal efficacy and safety balance, distinguishing it from the excess intracranial hemorrhage observed with the 0.4 mg/kg dose. Finally, we review the pivotal phase III trials across diverse populations demonstrating that tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg is non-inferior to alteplase and represents a practical, evidence-based alternative, particularly where single-bolus administration may facilitate workflow or transfer for endovascular thrombectomy. Viewed through this molecular-to-clinical framework, the development of tenecteplase illustrates how targeted protein engineering can translate into pharmacological, operational, and clinical advantages in stroke reperfusion therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.