ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Task Allocation Under High Workload: A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Fairness Experiences in Chinese Tertiary Grade A Hospitals.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnder high-workload conditions, clinical nurses arrange care with limited time and staffing. Detailed accounts remain limited regarding how nurses evaluate fairness in everyday task allocation and relate these evaluations to their care experiences and views on reform.
objectiveTo explore nurses' fairness experiences in task allocation under high-workload conditions in Chinese hospitals, including their expectations and concerns about reform.
methodsThis qualitative descriptive study used convenience sampling to recruit 27 female participants from seven tertiary Grade A hospitals in four regions of China. The core sample comprised 24 frontline clinical nurses; three head nurses were supplementary informants. Online semistructured interviews were conducted from April to May 2026. Thematic analysis combined the interview guide's predefined areas with open coding and comparison of interview data.
resultsSix themes and 16 subthemes were identified. The themes were as follows: (1) fairness judgments in task allocation; (2) fairness experiences and care adequacy; (3) care trade-offs under resource constraints; (4) emotional and professional experiences; (5) expectations for task allocation reform; and (6) concerns about task allocation reform. Nurses evaluated burden distribution, staff availability, and alignment between effort and rewards. They also described care reduced under time constraints, changes in care priorities, guilt and lingering fear, emotional buildup and relationship strain, and a defensive work orientation. Expectations involved allocation based on actual workload, flexible support during peak periods, and clear allocation and rotation rules; participants feared further increases in work demands and insufficient resources for implementation, and remained cautious about reform outcomes.
conclusionsNurses' fairness experiences concerned task distribution and accompanying support and recognition, alongside concerns about care adequacy. These accounts provide a descriptive basis for considering task allocation changes responsive to nurses' needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers could consider actual workload, flexible support during peak periods, and clear allocation and rotation rules, with attention to implementation resources and rest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.